Audio-to-transcript review
Keep the original audio beside the transcript so the resident can return to what was actually said.
An on-call case workspace for interns and residents
Bring the call, the chart checks,
and the senior handoff into one case.
Firstcall keeps the recording, transcript, problem-oriented note, chart items to verify, and handoff draft together. The resident compares every structured output with the source material and confirms it.
Pre-launch validation. Clinical judgment and reporting remain with the resident and supervising physician.
It contains no real patient data.
01 · What follows the first call
The call ends.
Reconstructing the case has only begun.
The audio, the chart review, and the preparation for a senior handoff usually live in different places. Firstcall gives the resident one case in which to assemble—and personally verify—the material.
- 01Call
What was heard has to be captured again.
To preserve symptoms and requests from an on-call notification, the resident returns to the audio and establishes the starting point of the case.
- 02Chart
Unanswered chart questions stay in memory.
Anything the call did not establish has to be found in the source chart, while the resident separately keeps track of what has and has not been checked.
- 03Handoff
The context has to be rebuilt for a senior.
Material gathered from the call and the chart still has to be ordered so that a supervising physician can review it quickly.
02 · The case workspace
Follow the trail from the recording
to each chart item that still needs checking.
The recording, transcript, problem-oriented structure, and chart questions sit on one screen. The resident moves between the source material and the structured view to verify each item.
The source call and the open checks stay in the same case.
This screen was made from a test call, not real patient data. The resident compares the structured material with the source before relying on it.
- 01
Record
Keep the shared on-call recording and original audio with the case.
- 02
Transcribe
Read the transcript with a visible reminder that it may be wrong.
- 03
Structure
Lay out the problem-oriented note and the chart items still to verify.
- 04
Confirm
The resident checks the sources and marks the state of each item.
03 · Handoff and reporting
Once the sources are checked,
prepare what the senior physician needs to review.
The checklist keeps open questions visible. A draft arranged as situation, background, assessment, and recommendation gives the report a working order. The resident reviews, edits, and sends it.
Unverified and verified are kept distinct.
The system does not mark an item as checked. The resident reviews the chart and source material, then records the state of each item.
The handoff draft is edited before it is sent.
It is a reference draft that orders the case as situation, background, assessment, and recommendation. The resident checks the substance and tone, revises it, and then reports.
04 · What the workspace supports
Give each unresolved point
a place in the resident's review order.
Firstcall is an assistive workspace that gathers source material and drafts in one case. The user checks the basis and the gaps behind every output.
Problem-oriented structure and chart checks
Organize the call by problem and separate the facts that still have to be found in the chart.
Review order and unresolved uncertainty
Show a provisional order for review alongside what remains uncertain, so the resident can see what to check next.
Case questions and a handoff draft
Ask questions against the same case material and review a draft for the supervising physician.
05 · What it does not do
Clinical judgment and the report
stay with the resident and supervising physician.
Firstcall produces material and drafts for review. It does not present an unchecked state as confirmed, and it does not take responsibility for clinical judgment or reporting.
It does not replace examination or review of the source chart.
It does not make a diagnosis or a treatment decision.
It does not send a handoff draft automatically or report in the resident's place.
It does not present an extracted value as fact until the resident confirms it.
06 · Current validation scope
as of 2026.08.11
What is being tested now
is the user workflow before launch.
We are reviewing the public product screens and a user-testing flow built from test calls. We do not classify that work as evidence of buyer demand or hospital production use.
- User
- Interns and residents
- Buyer
- Training hospitals and medical education programs
- Status
- Pre-launch validation
- Role
- Reference tool for residents
What we are testing
Case creation, comparison of audio with the transcript, structured checks, and the resident's review of a handoff draft
What we do not claim
Training outcomes, clinical outcomes, production use at an outside hospital, a purchase agreement, or an adoption record
07 · For training hospitals
Training hospitals and medical education programs
Set the questions for on-call training
with the training site first.
We welcome inquiries from training hospitals and education programs about user testing or pre-launch validation. Before anything begins, we align on the users, supervision, synthetic cases, review criteria, and stopping conditions.
Discuss a training-site validationTraining environment
Map the on-call workflow and how supervising physicians review the work.
Participant roles
Define which interns and residents take part and who reviews their work.
Review criteria
Agree on the user-testing questions and stopping conditions in advance.
08 · Evidence boundary
as of 2026.08.11
A product screen is not
evidence from clinical use.
We describe it on the premise that the resident judges and reports to a senior physician. User testing and pre-launch validation are not evidence of purchase intent, a contract, hospital production use, or a clinical result.
Product evidence
Product screens of the reference app for residents
Validation state
Pre-launch validation
Field evidence
Not evidence of adoption by clinics