Skip to content
AetherHeal

WoundScan AI

Pre-launch validation

research partnership

Boundaries drawn by hand.
Measurements that keep their scale.
Records made for comparison.

We are researching a structure in which clinicians draw the wound boundary on the image and set the scale themselves. Capture conditions, measurement basis and confirmation status are kept for comparison with the next observation of the same site.

Research partnership inquiry

The work inside the visit

  1. Open this observation
  2. Compare with the previous time point
  3. The physician confirms

WoundScan AI is at the stage of building the product structure and validation procedure with research partners. Final judgment on images and measurements remains with the physician.

One wound site,
in time order.

A conceptual diagram in which the boundary and scale set by the clinician are stored with the measurement record. Geometric shapes illustrate the comparison structure across time points.

WoundScan AIConceptual UI · synthetic data · no real actions

Hand-drawn boundary + scale

People define the boundary and the scale. Computed values remain in a to-be-reviewed state.

Human review remains open

Capture context
We are building a product structure that keeps patient, wound site and capture time beside the image.
Manual boundary and scale
The clinician's hand-drawn boundary and chosen scale are stored as the basis of each measurement.
Records by time point
The flow that links the previous image and this image under the same patient is reviewed with partners.

Measurement research to design with partners

Before looking at a measurement,
ask how it was measured.

Research questions to develop together, based on clinicians' manual boundary and scale input. Evaluation methods for capture, input and comparison are agreed while the product structure is being built.

01

Research question

How much does a boundary redrawn on the same image differ?

Proposed review method

Define a procedure in which reviewers redraw the boundary on the same example and record the difference between the input boundary and the geometric computation.

02

Research question

How should scale and capture conditions be recorded together?

Proposed review method

Bind reference length, site and capture time to the measurement input, and review a record format that marks missing items.

03

Research question

Can records from different time points be followed on the same site?

Proposed review method

Design a comparison procedure that reviews the previous and current images with each time point's boundary, scale and confirmation status.

Clinical partner
Defines the capture workflow, the criteria for hand-drawn boundaries and the reviewer roles.
AetherHeal
Builds the product structure that connects manual input, geometric computation and records by time point.
Joint outputs
A capture and measurement procedure, a review record form and the criteria for the next evaluation.

Input → preparation → human review

From the day the photo is taken
to the next check date, in one record.

Patient and site are matched first, then image and measurements go into the same record. After the physician confirms, the owner and time of the next observation are recorded.

Partner research works toward this flow while the product structure and validation procedure take shape.

  1. 01

    Open this observation

    Confirm the patient, wound site and capture time first.

  2. 02

    Receive the wound image

    Link the image to be reviewed to this observation record.

  3. 03

    Set the boundary and scale by hand

    The clinician draws the boundary and sets the reference length. Geometric measurements are computed from that input.

  4. 04

    Compare with the previous time point

    Load the previous record of the same site and review side by side.

  5. The physician confirms

    The physician checks the image and measurements and corrects what is needed.

  6. 06

    Record the next check

    Assign an owner and a check time to continue the progress record.

What to collect and when to stop
are written down before the research begins.

Images and measurements to collect, physician confirmation and stop conditions are defined within the scope agreed with partners.

What it does

WoundScan AI currently covers capture context, comparison structure across time points and the partner validation procedure. Organize the capture context to study. Build the comparison flow across time points. Document the validation procedure.

Scope and responsibility

This is a partner research stage. Interpreting the wound and deciding treatment remain with the physician. The research tool organizes images and measurements; the physician interprets them together with the patient's condition. Treatment choice, patient explanation, the record and the next observation are the physician's decisions.

Authority
Research scope
Partner institution, responsible person, target tasks and stop conditions are documented first.
Physician review
The physician confirms images and measurements and holds final clinical judgment.
Next observation
Owner and check time are recorded within the scope set by clinicians.
Data
Research purpose
Collected items and retention are defined within the agreed research purpose and validation procedure.
Images and measurements
Patient, site, capture time and confirmation status are kept distinct in the comparison structure.
Institutional connection
If hospital system access is needed, permissions and data scope are defined after a separate adoption review.

Evidence today · as of 2026-08-11

Where the research stands
and the next validation scope.

See the dated evidence record
Evidence in the current release
Partner co-development and validation procedure scope
Evidence from the field
No evidence of outside results
Boundary of the claim
We describe only the product structure partners review and the current validation scope.

Next step

Looking for clinical partners
to study wound progress with us.

Define the capture workflow, the measurements and the physician review criteria together, and document evaluation items and stop conditions.

Research partnership inquiry

Do not include patient-identifying information or clinical details in your inquiry.